Analytics, Education and Science, EU – Baltic States, Financial Services, Latvia, Legislation, Round Table
International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics
Sunday, 26.03.2017, 10:20
Spring 2016 European Semester package: country-specific recommendations
|Photo by J. Zhitluhin.|
The article was prepared for the International roundtable-seminar “Latvian banks: what lies ahead?” held in the Baltic International Academy on 18 May 2016. Its organizers: Baltic International Academy (BIA), Employers’ Confederation of Latvia (LDDK), Diplomatic Economic Club (DEC) and online magazine baltic-course.com.
Since the Commission took office at the end of 2014, it has implemented a number of changes to the European Semester making it more effective and relevant. These changes were announced in November 2014 in the Annual Growth Survey 2015, rolled out early in 2015 and confirmed in its Communication on next steps towards completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union in October 2015.
Our magazine extensively wrote about it (see e.g. European semester: further coordination for growth; European economy through the Semester and reforms; EU’s control over member states’ economic policies ; etc.)
These changes mean for instance that in the coming months, the Commission will be engaged with EU states’ governments, national parliaments, social partners and other stakeholders (as well as through bilateral meetings with national authorities) in discussing their policy priorities.
In February 2016, the Commission presented its detailed analysis of the economic and social situation of each EU state, in the form of a country report, as part of the so-called 2016 winter package.
In April 2016, the member states presented their National Reform Programmes (NRP) and their Stability Programmes (for euro area countries) or Convergence Programmes (for non-euro area countries), including any follow-up to the winter package.
The present may-month’s recommendations are based on these dialogues, programmes, Eurostat data and recently published Commission 2016 spring forecast.
Greece, which is currently subject to a stability support programme, is not covered by the present package and does not receive any country-specific recommendations. The assessment of Greece's compliance with its objectives is done within the framework of the NRP and Stability programmes.
The CSRs also reflect the Commission's efforts to make the European Semester as more effective and relevant economic governance instrument. Quite notable, Commission has this year proposed fewer recommendations while underlying key economic and social priorities identified in its Annual Growth Survey 2016. To strengthen national ownership, it has provided more time and more opportunities to engage and communicate with the EU states and stakeholders at all levels. It has also added a greater focus on the euro area challenges and on the interdependence among member states’ economies; recommendations for the euro-zone economic policy have been agreed earlier.
Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis, responsible for the Euro and Social Dialogue, said: “The economic package places major emphasis on the structural reforms needed to strengthen the EU's economic recovery, reduce obstacles to growth and boost employment. Modernising labour, product and service markets, making it easier to do business, for example by reforming public administration and making tax systems fairer and more efficient, would help open up more job and investment opportunities in the EU”.
On the fiscal side, the aggregate deficit level in the euro area is set to fall to 1.9% this year, down from a peak of 6.1% in 2010, helped also by the ongoing recovery. The fiscal stance in the euro area is expected to be slightly expansionary this year. However, he added, “adjustment efforts are still needed in a number of countries, especially in those where high debt levels remain a drag on growth and a source of vulnerability.”
Marianne Thyssen, Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs, Skills and Labour Mobility, said that in a rapidly changing world of work, the path of reform taken together by the member states and social partners needs to continue. Unemployment is going down but much more progress is needed; thus this year's recommendations have a strong focus on social and employment issues. She added that “only by ensuring that social considerations are better integrated in all EU policy areas we will truly achieve a Social Europe”.
Pierre Moscovici, Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs, underlined that slower global growth and high uncertainty meant that the EU must accelerate efforts to strengthen the European economy through well-targeted reforms. Responsible fiscal policies should also support job creation and help to spread the fruits of the recovery more widely. He added that these have been the guiding principles underpinning the Commission's economic and fiscal policy guidance for the states in 2016-17.
Country-specific recommendations for 2016
As soon as so-called external factors influencing support for Europe's moderate recovery are fading, domestic sources of growth are gaining in importance. New CSRs therefore focus on the Commission's three priority areas:
= Investment is still low compared to pre-crisis levels but is gaining traction, also helped by the Investment Plan for Europe.
= Faster progress on structural reforms is necessary to boost the recovery and raise the long-term growth potential of EU economies.
= All EU states need to pursue responsible fiscal policies and ensure growth-friendly composition of their budgets.
The EU-28 states have advanced reforms during 2015, but the pace of such progress needs to be accelerated to contribute, as it should, to jobs, growth and investment. The implementation of country-specific recommendations varies across policy areas. This can be due to the complexity of the reforms to be undertaken, such as reforms of labour and product markets, pensions systems and banking sector. Most significant progress is observed with regard to recommendations in the areas of financial services and active labour market policies. In contrast, more progress could have been expected in generating a business and employment friendly and regulatory environment, increasing female labour market participation and reducing barriers in the services sector. More progress in implementation is identified for the EU states experiencing imbalances than for the states without imbalances, presumably due to the larger need for reform, stronger policy dialogue and, in some cases, in response to stronger market pressure.
In countries with high external liabilities, the large current account deficits of the pre-crisis period have been considerably reduced or even turned into surpluses. In some other EU states, surpluses persist and remain very large. Cost competitiveness has generally improved and there is evidence of structural adjustment in terms of resources shifting to the tradable sector. Unemployment is declining, albeit to different degrees across the EU states.
The process of balance-sheet repairs is progressing, with deleveraging ongoing in the household and corporate sectors, and bank capitalisation improving. In most countries, deleveraging is mainly linked to reduced spending, while in some countries, the relative level of debt has gone down due to robust growth. In this context, vulnerabilities associated with persisting debt overhang in some sectors remain a source of concern, while the financial sector is affected by low profitability coupled with high levels of non-performing legacy loans and the need to adjust to a more demanding regulatory environment.
Concerning the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure (MIP), the Commission confirms that Croatia and Portugal are to be considered to be experiencing excessive imbalances. They should implement their reform agendas rigorously and in a timely manner. The level of ambition of the two countries' national reform programmes (NRPs) is broadly adequate and confirms their intention to correct their excessive imbalances.
The Commission remains committed to support reform efforts at the member states' level. The Structural Reform Support Service, established in 2015, is already helping with effective reform implementation, building on its experience in Cyprus and Greece. A legislative proposal to expand the service into an EU instrument for all EU states is currently under discussion with co-lawmakers to establish a Structural Reform Support Programme, which will allow the mobilisation of technical support for a broad range of key reform areas.
Fiscal developments and decisions
Overall, the aggregate deficit level in the euro area is set to fall to 1.9% this year, down from a peak of 6.1% in 2010. The Commission has also taken a number of steps under the Stability and Growth Pact. First, in the light of latest data, the European Commission recommends to the Council to close the Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) for Cyprus, Ireland and Slovenia as these countries have brought their deficits below the 3% of GDP Treaty reference value in 2015 and the correction is expected to be durable.
That means their deficits are forecast to remain below 3% of GDP in 2016 and 2017. For Cyprus, this would mean an exit one year ahead of the 2016 deadline. If the Council so decides, this would reduce the total number of EU states in EDP to six (Croatia, France, Greece, Portugal, Spain and UK), down from 24 states in EDP in spring 2011.
Second, the Commission adopted reports for Belgium, Italy and Finland under Article 126(3) TFEU, in which it reviews their compliance with the debt criterion of the Treaty. While these countries appear to be at variance with the debt reference value, and the benchmark pace of reduction towards it, the reports, after analysing the relevant factors, suggest that the Stability and Growth Pact should be considered as currently complied with. For Italy, the Commission will review its assessment of the relevant factors in a new report by November as further information on the resumption of the adjustment path towards the medium-term budgetary objective for 2017 becomes available.
As regards Portugal and Spain, the Commission recommends to the Council to recommend a durable correction of the excessive deficit in 2016 and 2017 respectively, by taking the necessary structural measures and by using all windfall gains for deficit and debt reduction. In line with its duty to monitor the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure under Article 126 of the Treaty, the Commission will come back to the situation of these two states in early July.
Finally, the Commission has launched a formal consultation to the EU states that are contracting parties of the Fiscal Compact to enquire about their progress in implementing in national law the provisions of the Fiscal Compact. The EU states concerned have two months to submit their observations to the Commission.
The Commission calls on the Council to endorse the proposed approach for 2016-17 and adopt the country-specific recommendations, and on the states to implement them fully and in a timely manner. EU ministers are expected to discuss the country-specific recommendations before EU Heads of State and Government are due to endorse them. It is then up to EU states to implement the CSRs by addressing them through their national economic and budgetary policies in 2016-2017.
More information can be seen:
= Overview table of Member States in the European Semester; = Country-specific recommendations 2016; = Decisions under the Stability and Growth Pact; = Memo on country-specific recommendations; = Key Areas: Thematic fiches; = European Semester 2016: Commission reminds Member States of fiscal obligations; = Spring 2016 Economic Forecast: Staying on the course amid high risks; = European Semester 2016: fewer Member States have economic imbalances than a year ago; = The EU's economic governance explained
Reference: Commission press release “Spring 2016 European Semester package: Commission issues country-specific recommendations”, Brussels, 18 May 2016. In: