Analytics, Energy, EU – Baltic States, Transport

International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics Friday, 26.04.2024, 07:09

End of fossil fuels: warning to the Baltic States

Eugene Eteris, BC/RSU, Riga, 23.08.2017.Print version
At the time when some Baltic States are receiving LNG tankers from the US, some other Nordic countries are getting rid of existing oil/gas production. Denmark’s option seems to show another vision of energy security and provide for more sustainable energy consumption.

Recent gas supply for Lithuania goes in sharp contrast with what other Nordic region states are doing. Thus according to the US embassy in Vilnius, the gas supply contract between Lietuvos Duju Tiekimas (Lithuanian Gas Supply, or LDT) and the US Cheniere Energy was going to stay and being commercially feasible. Besides, Lithuania also receives LNG from Norway's Statoil and another American supplier, the US Koch Supply& Trading.

 

Gas shipment to the Baltics will go on: the market situation and its development, according to Lithuanian officials, is showing “expected increase in amount of these shipments” said Lithuanian Energy Minister Z. Vaiciunas. Thus, more shipments of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the US are expected to follow after the first-ever LNG cargo was delivered to Klaipeda from across the Atlantic on 21.08.2017.

 

Both Energy Minister Vaiciunas and Lietuvos Energija CEO D. Misiunas said that US LNG is currently cheaper than Gazprom’s gas, but they do not predict that Russian gas will be forced out of the market. At the same time, there is a visual increase for Russian gas supply in Central and Western European states: export has increased by over 16% in Germany, by about 75% in Austria, by about 27% in Slovakia and Check Republic. As to the Baltic States, the demand for gas increased, correspondingly, by 90% in Estonia, 75% in Latvia and by 125% in Lithuania.

http://www.baltic-course.com/rus/good_for_business/?doc=132272

 

Some experts say that the “alarming situation” is due to so-called over-contracting in European gas supply: i.e. more supply offers than the real consumption. Thus, before 2008 (i.e. before the crisis), gas consumption exceed the available supply offers; hence future supply contracts were done in line with the predicted extensions. Presently, most countries are re-assessing their gas supplies and needs with changes in structural energy mix and renewables.   

http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/good_for_business/?doc=132403


Another trend in a Nordic state

Oil prices have started to recover after an extended downturn, strengthening profit at major oil producers in the second quarter of 2017 and opening the door to more mergers in the sector.


Big energy companies like BP, Chevron and Total have wrestled in recent years with a sharp decline in oil prices: a barrel of crude now sells for around $52, less than half its peak in early 2014.

 

As the price of oil fell to less than half of what it was at its recent peak, so did the oil industry’s cash flows. But after much adjustment by oil companies, and even a complete reworking of their businesses, the first quarter of this year saw a return to positive cash flow. Over the last two and a half years, the oil industry has experienced its deepest downturn since at least the 1990s.

If history is any guide, after every oil bust comes a recovery, if not a boom; this time a recovery has been tentative, at best.

 

The oil companies in the Baltics and around the world initially sought to bolster earnings by cutting jobs and investment, but have since gone further by embracing new technologies and construction methods. As a result, operating costs have fallen and cash flows have firmed. As recently as 2015, it cost $97 for big energy companies to break even on a barrel of oil, after expenses, investments and shareholder dividends, according to an analysis by RBC Capital Markets, an investment bank. That figure has now nearly been halved. Such adjustments have ensured that if oil prices do rise, profits at major oil and gas companies will rise. The shift was borne out in the latest batch of results, with ChevronExxon MobilRoyal Dutch Shell and Total all reporting much healthier earnings.

 

Nevertheless, the Danish container shipping company A.P. Moller-Maersk agreed to sell its oil and gas business to the French energy giant Total for about $5 billion. Maersk often said that it planned to spin off or sell its oil business as it focused on its transport and logistics services operations. Besides, the Danish energy policy is based on renewables: by 2050 the country will end up using any fossil fuels. 

 

Chairman and chief executive of Total, Patrick Pouyanné, said in August 2017 that the company would “take advantage of the low-cost environment” to start new projects and seek acquisitions.

The proposed deal with Maersk values the Danish company’s oil and gas business at $7.45 billion, including debt.

Reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/21/business/dealbook/total-maersk-oil-gas.html?emc=edit_mbe_20170822&nl=morning-briefing-europe&nlid=81778027&te=1

Continue reading the main story.  

 

“This transaction delivers an exceptional opportunity for Total to acquire, via an equity transaction, a company with high quality assets which are an excellent fit with many of Total’s core regions,” Mr. Pouyanné said.

 

Under the terms of the deal, the Danish company would receive 97.5 million Total shares, or about 3.8 percent of the French company. Total would also assume $2.5 billion in debt as part of the transaction.

 

Maersk’s main shareholder also has the possibility of a seat on Total’s board of directors. The deal is subject to regulatory approval and to a consultation process with Total’s employees. It is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018. As part of the transaction, Total would also assume decommissioning obligations of $2.9 billion, Maersk said in its own statement.

 

The Danish company added that it would seek to return a “material portion of the value” of the shares it received from Total in the form of extraordinary dividend, share buyback or distribution of Total shares by 2019.

 


Spreading global influence: a deal with Iran

The French company said the purchase of a Danish oil/gas producer in a relatively safe part of the world was part of a “balancing of country risks” just months after Total signed a deal with Iran to lead a natural gas project in the Persian Gulf.

 

The agreement with Tehran could open Iran’s huge energy reserves to international markets. But it also exposes Total to a high degree of risk, particularly if President Trump reneges on the Iran nuclear deal, or if Washington imposes further sanctions on Tehran.


Total wants to sign an agreement in Tehran committing his company to lead a natural gas project in the Persian Gulf that could open Iran’s huge petroleum reserves to international players.


Under the terms of the deal, Total will invest $1 billion in the first phase of development of part of the South Pars gas field. It will form a partnership with the China National Petroleum Corporation and the Iranian company Petropars.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/03/business/energy-environment/iran-total-france-gas-energy.html?action=click&contentCollection=DealBook&module=RelatedCoverage&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article






Search site