Financial Services, Latvia, Legislation, Transport
International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics
Tuesday, 23.04.2024, 10:20
Charges to be brought against 4 persons Rigas Satiksme "nanotechnology" case
The
investigation established that the group of persons rigged the municipal
transport company's procurement of nano-detergents and other cleaning aids by
arranging the conclusion of a contract with a supplier. The selected supplier
in 2013 supposedly delivered nano-detergents, even though the company did not
possess such detergents, the police said. The evidence suggests that labels and
documents of the products were forged.
After the group had successfully implemented the fraud
within one agreement, it decided to repeat the procurement in 2014.
The police believes that the fraud has caused more
than EUR 700,000 loss to Rigas Satiksme company. The criminal activities were
bused in 2015 when mass media reported on possible fraud.
A fraud conducted on a large scale or by an organized
group carries a jail term of 2-10 years.
The police also noted that some of the persons
involved in the fraud scheme will also face charges of money laundering. This
crime carried a jail term of 3-12 years.
Restrictive measures that do not involve detention are
imposed on the suspects.
The State police during investigation cooperation with
the prosecutor’s office investigating financial and economic crimes and several
foreign law enforcement institutions. The case contains about 10,000 pages
divided into 40 volumes.
On February 1, 2015, the Nothing Personal analytical
news program of TV3 commercial TV reported that Rigas Satiksme may be possibly
involved in a fraud scheme related to the company's procurement of detergents
and other cleaning aids – payments have been made for nano-detergents, but just
plain water has been supplied instead.
Responding to the TV report, about the procurement of
"nanotechnological" detergents and other cleaning aids, Rigas
Satiksme initiated a disciplinary investigation. The company set up a
disciplinary investigative commission, but the inquiry found no violations in
the procurement procedure.