EU – Baltic States, Good for Business, Legislation, Markets and Companies, Transport

The Commission's report on customs actions to enforce intellectual property rights, IPR has been issued annually since 2000 and is based on data transmitted by the EU states' customs administrations to the Commission.

The data provide valuable information which supports the analysis of intellectual property rights infringements and helps other institutions such as the European Union Intellectual Property Office and the OECD to map economic data and the most common routes for counterfeiters.

Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs, Pierre Moscovici,  said on the occasion of the report's publication that high level of protection of intellectual property had been crucial to support growth and create jobs.

He underlined that fake goods pose a real threat to health and safety of EU consumers and also undermine legal businesses and state revenues. Studies show that the EU is particularly exposed to imports of counterfeit products. 

Customs authorities play important role in combating fake goods; they need support and resources to enable them to protect citizens from the dangers that they can pose. Cooperation between law enforcement authorities should be strengthened and risk management systems upgraded to protect the EU from goods infringing on intellectual property rights, he added.

Fake goods' categories

Cigarettes were the top category (24%) for articles detained and toys the second largest group (17%), followed by foodstuffs (13%) and packaging material (12%).

The number of intercepted articles rose by 2% compared to 2015.

China remains the clear leader when it comes to the provenance of fake goods: 80% of articles arrived from China in 2016. 

Large amounts of cigarettes originated in Vietnam and Pakistan, while Singapore was the top source for counterfeit alcoholic beverages.

Iran was the main source country for fake clothing accessories. Hong Kong was the leader for counterfeit mobile phones and India topped the list for counterfeit medicines.

In more than 90% of detentions, goods were either destroyed or a court case was initiated to determine an infringement or as part of criminal procedures.

Source: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-2082_en.htm?locale=en

Full report on EU customs enforcement and IPR at:

https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/report_on_eu_customs_enforcement_of_ipr_at_the_border_2017.pdf