Analytics, Cooperation, EU – Baltic States, Modern EU
International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics
Friday, 19.04.2024, 13:29
EU’s macro-regional cooperation: smart specialisation approach
Macro-regional
cooperation in the European Union has a rather short history: it originated a
decade ago in the Baltic Sea region (BSR) in order to “unite" regional
authorities around quicker and more efficient solutions for local issues. The
only requirement for the EU’s support was that these issues should have a “European
dimension” (instead of purely local): i.e. they have to be within the EU’s
integration process.
During the last decade the macro-regional concept proved its
deliverance: several other sub-regional strategies were adopted within the EU: for
example for the Danube region, Adriatic-Ionian and Alpine regions (during
2011-15); sometimes these strategies even include non-EU countries. Besides,
there are other sub-regional groupings in the EU: e.g. Benelux-3 countries or Visegrad
Four, including (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia).
Thus, to deliver on these objectives, Commission’s DG Regio provides support through the “financial
interventions” by the European Regional
Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion
Fund (CF), together with the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds
(which include European social fund (ESF), European Agricultural Fund for Rural
Development (EAFRD) and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). To that
end, the Treaty establishes the European Structural and Investment Funds, ESIF
(Lisbon Treaty, art. 175).
These “regional funding” during last five years (2014-19) accounted for about one-third of the total EU budget (about € 45 billion a year); for example during 2017, about 660 action plans have been adopted in the EU states. Thus, in one year only (2017), two pilot projects were launched: a) to provide tailored support for regions facing industrial transition, and b) help inter-regional partnerships to develop competitive European value chains. The both aimed at providing adequate assistance to all European states/regions in investing in their niche areas of competitive strength (so-called "smart specialisation" process, 3S) and generate innovative and resilient growth needed to withstand globalization’s challenges.
There have been already 10 EUSBSR’s conferences; the 11th
one titled “European sub-regional strategies” (17 June 2020) will take place in Turku/Finland;
this yearly conference’s motto: “Our
Region, Our Future-Towards a Decade of Innovation and Sustainability”.
Source: https://www.balticsea-region-strategy.eu/
Quite remarkable is
that the 10th EUSBSR Forum’s motto was: “reduce, reuse and rethink”: it provided a platform for discussions
on present and perspective regional authorities’ planning on sustainable and
circular economy issues.
Attention to circular economy has become an important “path
to wellbeing of the people in the BSR” and became a dominated model in regional
economy. Instead of age-old approach based on “take-make-consume-dispose”
concept, which is completely unsustainable, it has to be re-arranged with new
notions concentrated on reuse, de-compose, recycle, de-consume, etc.
with additional validity of an appropriate education and training in
sustainability principles. For example, presently Latvian recycling share is
the lowest among states in BSR with 39%, compared to 46% in Lithuania, 47% in
Estonia and over 50% in Denmark and Sweden. Thus, both new circular economy
principles and waste management are becoming highly desirable aspects in
sub-regional cooperation.
More in: Circular
economy’s priority in the 10th EUSBSR Forum. 15.06.2019. In:
http://www.baltic-course.com/eng2/modern_eu/?doc=149881;
additional reference sources in:
Baltics’ regions: lessons from EUSBSR, in: http://www.baltic-course.com/eng2/editors_note/?doc=20623.
Regional disparities in BSR
The disparities in
the regions of the BSR states are still great: the reduction
shall be a political and socio-economic priority for decision-makers.
More in: Eteris E. Comprehensive EU strategy to target
urgent regional challenges. In:
http://www.baltic-course.com/eng2/modern_eu/?doc=149719
While the gap in living standards among BSR’s states has
been reduced during last decade, the differences abide: e.g. economically
(through the GDP per capita), about 81% of the EU’s average in Lithuania and
Estonia and 70% in Latvia, whereas corresponding figures in the Nordic states
are: 110% of the EU’s average in Finland, 121% in Sweden and 126% in Denmark.
Source: Latvijas
intereses Eiropas Savieniba (2019/2), “Bowling together: Nordic Baltic Six
in the EU”, p.20.
EU political priorities in the BSR’s “smart specialization”
The 3S concept means that “smart” growth in the EU states resides on innovative approaches to
development, which include the perspectives of the 4th industrial
revolution. Another “S”- specialisation
– is about the states/regions’ capacities in using available resources
(natural, human, etc.) in achieving competitive advantages in Europe and
globally. Finally, “strategic growth”
means defining perspective vision for any state/region in the long-term
perspective.
Thus, a uniting factor in 3S is a strategic economic growth
through support for research and innovation.
More in: Sparitis
O. and Eteris E. Modern European science policy: challenges and opportunities
for Latvian perspective growth. - SIA Medicinas Publish. 2019. – 124 pp.
Looking at the priorities in the BSR, it is important to see
the contents of the EU’s growth strategy for 2021-27. There are four vital dimensions in the EU’ perspective
growth directions: first, a transition
to a nature-friendly and climate neutral policy as the EU’ goal up to 2050. Second, developing new technologies and
sustainable solutions with which the EU states can increase their economies and
become global leaders in an increasingly digitalised world, including cybersecurity,
artificial intelligence and 5G. Therefore, for example, the digital
technologies have become a key enabler in the European Green Deal.
Third, the necessary
measures to complete the EU’s economic and monetary union (EMU) to ensure that
all economic tools are available to adverse possible economic shock; in this
regard, the international role of the euro must be strengthened to enhance
European SMEs’ role in the global markets. A vibrant and resilient EMU shall rest
on the solid foundations provided by the two other EU “unions” – the Banking
Union and the Capital Markets Union.
Fourth, the new
economic agenda must ensure that the transition is fair and inclusive; it must
pay particular attention to the regions, industries and workers who will have
to make the largest transitions.
Examples of 3S in the Nordic states
A national 3S strategy - up to the end of 2020- was adopted in Sweden in 2015 for sustainable growth with the following priorities: new bio-based materials, products and services; Internet of things; ICTs introduction in electric components and systems, in automotive industrial processes; Graphene’s industrial use; prevention of endemic diseases; “Production 2030” program for advanced manufacturing; light-weight and metallic materials and construction; and mining and metal extraction.
Swedish strategic innovation agendas and programmes serve as the guiding tools for industry, the public sector and academia to collaborate for common priorities in terms of investments in research, development and innovation. Source:https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/232763/SE_NAT_Strategy+for+sustainable+growth+and+attractivity+2015-2020
Finland has not
revealed specifically the 3S priorities; they are included into several national
programs supported from the ESIF and other EU funds with the total amount of
about € 8 billion during 2014-20. The main programs’ items, according to the
EU’s allocation’s resources are: environment
protection and resource efficiency (about €2 bn); climate change adaptation and risk prevention (about € 1,8 bn); competitiveness and SMEs (about €1,4 bn);
research and innovation (about € 0,8
bn); sustainable and quality employment
(about €0,7bn); low‑CO2 emission’s carbon
economy, social Inclusion and education – all three about €0,4-0,5 bn each.
These EU’s allocation showed the European smart
specialisation priorities applied to Finland.
Source: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/countries/FI#
3S in the Baltic States and Poland
= Estonian 3S
priorities include: e-health, bio-technology (incl. healthy food,
medicine, diagnostics, therapy and bio-banking); ICT industry and robotics; other ICT’s application (incl. cybersecurity, robotics, e-governance and
“big data”); materials technology,
and rational use of natural resources.
Source: https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/regions/EE/tags/EE
= 3S priorities in
Lithuania are the following: agricultural
innovations and food technologies (incl. sustainable agro-biological
resources and safer food; innovative food processing/development, as well as
improvement and processing of biological raw materials, such as bio-refinery); sustainable energy, (incl. energy
efficiency, diagnostic, monitoring and management of generators and grids;
energy and fuel production using biomass/waste with waste treatment and
disposal; development of smart low-energy-digital construction; solar energy
equipment and technologies in electricity, heating and cooling); new materials, production processes and
technologies (incl. photonic and laser technologies, functional materials
and coatings, structural and composite materials, as well as flexible
technological systems for product development and fabrication); health technologies and biotechnologies
(incl. molecular technologies for medicine and bio-pharmacy; advanced applied
technologies for individual and public health; advanced medical engineering for
early diagnostics and treatment); transport,
logistics and ICT (incl. smart transport and communication technology
systems; modeling management of international transport corridors; advanced
electronic technologies; ICT infrastructure, cloud computing solutions and
services); inclusive and creative society
(incl. modern education technologies and processes; technologies for the
development and implementation of breakthrough innovations).
Source: https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/regions/LT/tags/LT
= Smart specialisation priorities
in Latvia include: knowledge
intensive bio-economy (incl. Sustainable and productive forest management
with innovative high value-added niche products from wood; full wood biomass
use for chemical processing and energy; innovative plant and animal breeding
technologies; food safety); biomedicine,
medical technologies and biotechnology (incl. chemical and biotechnological
methods for production of pharmaceutical and bioactive substances; new human
and veterinary medicinal products; individualized treatment and diagnostic
methods using cell technology; functional foods, therapeutic cosmetics and
bioactive natural substances); smart
materials, technology and engineering (incl. implant and composite
materials, thin layers and coatings, equipment and machinery; glass fiber products and smart glass-based
materials); advanced ICT (incl. innovative
knowledge management, system modeling and software methods; sectoral ICT
hardware/hardware applications; cyber-physics systems, language technologies
and semantic web; bulk data and knowledge infrastructure; information security
and quantum PCs; computer system testing methods); smart energy (incl. development of smart grids in the demand-supply
systems, smart buildings and automotive house systems; modern technologies for
energy from renewables; Increasing energy efficiency in construction and residential
infrastructure elements; sustainable energy for transport and electric mobility).
Source: https://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/regions/LV/tags/LV
More on Latvian “green growth” and new perspectives in:
http://www.baltic-course.com/eng2/editors_note/?doc=20885
= 3S for Poland
include: healthy society (incl. new
medical products and manufacturing technologies for diseases’ diagnosis and
advanced therapy); bio-economy (incl.
agro-food, forestry and environment); innovative
bio-technological technologies and products (incl. organic and flexible
electronics, automation and robotics, photonics, creative technologies and
innovative marine technologies); sustainable
energy (incl. smart-energy efficient construction, high efficiency,
low-emission and integrated circuits for manufacturing, storage, transmission
and distribution of smart-energy-grid, as well as sustainable transport
solutions); natural resources and waste
management (incl. processing technologies for rational use of natural
resources, optimizing consumption and re-use of secondary raw materials for energy
mix).
3S in the BSR states: some challenges and perspectives
Generally, the EU's
target is to reach 20 per cent of its energy mix from renewable sources by the
end of 2020 and at least 32% by 2030. Among the EU-27 states, 12 countries (including
6 BSR states) have already reached a share equal to or above their national
2020 binding targets: Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark,
Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Cyprus, Finland and
Sweden. Electricity production from hydro power and wind power is
accounted according to normalisation rules of Annex II of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Since 2011, only biofuels and bio-liquids declared by countries (as compliant
with criteria of sustainability defined in art. 17-18 of Directive 2009/28/EC)
are included in the share of energy from renewable sources.
Reference to: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy
Sweden has had by far the highest share in 2018 with more
than half (54.6%) of its energy coming from renewable sources, ahead of
Finland(41.2%), Latvia(40.3%), Denmark(36.1%) and Austria(33.4%). At the
opposite end of the scale, the lowest proportion of renewables was registered
in the Netherlands - 7.4%; low shares, less than ten percent, were also
recorded in Malta - 8.0%, Luxembourg - 9.1% and Belgium - 9.4%.
During 2021-23 Lithuania is likely to see a new boom in the
construction of new turbines; country’s wind power plants generated a total of
1.453 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2019, a rise of almost 28 percent
from 1.139 TWh in 2018.
Source: http://www.baltic-course.com/eng2/good_for_business/?doc=153969
EU’s Interreg program
In relation to
the European Commission’s draft regulation on Interreg published in May 2018,
the Commission in the Orientation Paper recommends that the future Interreg
Baltic Sea Region program could be thematically focused on the Policy Objective
1 (“smart Europe”), Policy Objective
2 (greener and low-carbon Europe)
and an Interreg-specific objective (better
Interreg governance; safer and more secure Europe).
The future
Interreg Baltic Sea Region programme would also continue to support the
implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.
More in Interreg in:
https://www.interreg-baltic.eu/post2020.html
In the Joint
Programming Committee both EU countries participate as well as Norway, Russia
and Belarus; it was created at the end of 2019 with main tasks to select future
thematic priorities and allocate funds to those priorities in the BSR. The
first meeting took place this February under the Latvian chairmanship. Interreg
has a managing authority in Germany and a joint secretariat with branches in
the member states: e.g. Riga office is attached to Latvian State Regional
Development Agency.
Conclusion
The 3S-idea stems from the time of the so-called EU
Constitution some 20 years ago; however, the project failed initially to take
shape, but the “federal concept” in the European integration survived. In the
Lisbon Treaty-2009 this concept has been depicted in the division of competence
between the EU institutions and the member states (e.g. excusive, shared and
supporting). However, in 2011 the EU institutions started a massive advice
program for national and regional authorities on their specialisation
strategies, formally called “the 3S”. The ultimate idea was to enabling the 3S
approach in each state and region to be included into their “competitive
advantages” process in both Europe and worldwide.
In March 2017, the Commission’s “white paper” envisioned
five scenarios for a “future of Europe’s concept” giving the member states
certain “freedom” in integration efforts through cohesion policy/funds. Without any firm conclusions on “scenarios”,
the present Commission’s College adopted a new “strategic political agenda” for
the next five years, which includes among other directions: - the European
“green deal”; - digital economy; - progressive democratic institutions; -
attention to the “social market economy”, and – increasing the EU’s role in the
world.
Taking into consideration the EU’s strategic agenda, the 3S-concept
is supposed to drive the states’ growth pattern along “smart specialisation” regarding
their own resource/priorities and competition’s challenges. However,
specialization’s trends in the BSR states do not seem to create “national
growth niches” with one-two-three major development directions; examples in
some Nordic/Baltic States have shown that the specific diversification is
rather broad! On the contrary, there are numerous overlapping and integrated 3S
spheres providing for closer cooperation among the countries in BSR; it’s time
for a more radical political decision towards “common 3S dimension”.
- 26.08.2021 LLC Dizozols Investments finalizes investment attraction deal with Crowdestor with record-high profits
- 30.12.2020 Hotels showing strong interest in providing self-isolation service
- 30.12.2020 EU to buy additional 100 mln doses of coronavirus vaccine
- 30.12.2020 ЕС закупит 100 млн. дополнительных доз вакцины Biontech и Pfizer
- 29.12.2020 В Латвии вводят комендантский час, ЧС продлена до 7 февраля
- 29.12.2020 Latvia to impose curfew, state of emergency to be extended until February 7
- 29.12.2020 Linde Gas открывает завод в Кедайняйской СЭЗ
- 29.12.2020 Президент Литвы утвердил бюджет 2021 года
- 29.12.2020 В Риге можно изолироваться в трех гостиницах
- 28.12.2020 Tartu to support students' solar car project