Banks, Financial Services, Latvia, Legislation
International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics
Friday, 26.04.2024, 13:34
Latvian Saeima repeatedly adopts controversial amendments to Credit Institutions Law
The decision
was made with 49 votes to 20, while 15 lawmakers did not participate in the
vote. The decision was supported by lawmakers from the Harmony party, the Union
of Greens and Farmers, the National Alliance, For Latvia From the Heart. Unity
lawmakers, Ilmars Latkovskis and Romands Naudins (National Alliance)
voted against the decision.
Returning the amendments to the parliament Vejonis
noted that the legislative amendments developed alongside the ongoing
liquidation process of Trasta Komercbanka and court’s decisions on appointing the
administrator, cause suspicion of the wish to affect these processes.
As reported, Saeima in early June adopted the
amendments to the Credit Institutions Law in the final reading. 56 Saeima
members voted for the amendments - members of the Union of Greens and Farmers,
National Alliance, Harmony, and For Latvia from the Heart. Twenty MPs were
against the amendments - Unity members and Artuss Kaimins (KPV LV),
while Edvards Smiltens (Unity) abstained. Another seventeen Saeima members, representing the
Greens/Farmers, Unity, Latvian Alliance of Regions and Harmony, did not vote.
Vejonis returned the controversial amendments to the
Credit Institutions Law back to the parliament for revision, pointing at
concerns about the true goal of the amendments.
The amendments stipulate that persons who, for the
preceding two years, were authorized by a creditor to represent him or her in
relations with a credit institution, may not be appointed the given credit
institution's liquidator. A similar restriction will apply to credit
institutions' insolvency administrators.
Vejonis said that the amendments considerably narrow
the range of possible candidates for the liquidators and insolvency
administrators for credit institutions, and restricts the opportunity to find
the best candidate for the liquidation or insolvency process. The reasons for
such amendments remain unclear.
Vejonis in a letter to Saeima speaker Inara Murniece underscored that insufficient supervision and control of insolvency
processes and possibilities to use insolvency processes for malicious reasons
cause considerable losses to individuals and the state. It further increases
distrust in business environment and threatens attraction of investments to the
national economy, the president said.