Competition, Lithuania, Markets and Companies, Retail
International Internet Magazine. Baltic States news & analytics
Saturday, 12.10.2024, 05:33
Lithuania: Konkurencijos Taryba suggests stricter liability for major retailers‘ unfair practices to suppliers
The purpose of the aforementioned Law is to limit the use of market
power exercised by major retailers and ensure the balance of interests between retail
companies and food and drink suppliers. The Law prohibits five major retailers, namely MAXIMA, RIMI,
IKI, NORFA and LIDL, from requiring from their suppliers any “entry”
fees, asking for compensation for the lost income or for the costs of sales promotion, etc.
It was expected that after establishing these prohibitions by law, major
retailers would refrain from imposing unfair supply conditions, unreasonable
requirements or commitments or transferring the risks of their activity to the
suppliers.
In order to find out whether such
legal regulation has been effective, from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 Konkurencijos
taryba carried out the monitoring of the Law and sent questionnaires to 5 major
retailers and 306 suppliers asking if legal regulation is effective and ensures
the balance of interests, if Konkurencijos taryba, in their view, has
sufficient powers assigned by the Law, if competition in the retail trade market
has changed after the Law entered into force, etc.
The majority of 224 respondents
(suppliers) said that considering the retailers’ income, a maximum fine of EUR
120,000 is too small and does not ensure the balance of interests between
retailers and suppliers. Konkurencijos taryba agrees that the maximum amount of
a fine envisaged by the Law does not have a deterrent effect since it makes
only 0.007–0.04 per cent of the gross annual income of major retailers. Besides, in
accordance with the provisions of the Law and case law, the authority is not
able to impose the maximum fine: for the infringements of the Law by major
retailers in 2014–2019, the authority imposed fines ranging from EUR 11,590 to
EUR 73,000.
Having evaluated the practice of
other EU countries where the fines reach up to 10 per cent of the annual
income, Konkurencijos taryba suggests introducing stricter financial liability of
up to 2 per cent of the annual sales income in the preceding business year. The
proposal is also in line with the EU Directive on unfair trading practices in
business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain, the
provisions of which will have to be transposed into national law, envisaging
deterrent fines for retailers‘ practices to suppliers.
The suppliers also suggested
amending the Law by establishing the prohibition for retailers to impose disproportionate
fines on suppliers for minor breaches of the contract. As it was stated by food
and drink suppliers, retail companies often tend to impose sanctions for
insignificant delay of goods or failure to fulfill large orders which the
supplier is not able to execute. Konkurencijos
taryba is planning to carefully examine information on fines by retailers
submitted by the suppliers, as well as the EU practice and, if necessary,
submit relevant proposals.
- 28.01.2022 BONO aims at a billion!
- 30.12.2020 Накануне 25-летия Балтийский курс/The Baltic Course уходит с рынка деловых СМИ
- 30.12.2020 On the verge of its 25th anniversary, The Baltic Course leaves business media market
- 30.12.2020 EU to buy additional 100 mln doses of coronavirus vaccine
- 30.12.2020 ЕС закупит 100 млн. дополнительных доз вакцины Biontech и Pfizer
- 29.12.2020 Linde Gas открывает завод в Кедайняйской СЭЗ
- 29.12.2020 Lithuanian president signs 2021 budget bill into law
- 29.12.2020 Number of new companies registered in Estonia up in 2020
- 29.12.2020 Президент Литвы утвердил бюджет 2021 года
- 28.12.2020