PRIVATIZATION
RATING
HISTORY


Higher place, higher price

By Olga Smirnova

In good tradition, the BC offers its readers a list of the top Baltic companies, split into industry sectors. For groundwork, we took Estonia's Kaibe top 500, Latvia's top 300, published by the Dienas Bizness daily, and Lithuania's Verslo Zinios, and included companies with a turnover in excess of 30 million US dollars. The result is slightly more than a hundred top Baltic companies, and just as before, her majesty trade and attendant transit lead the Baltic market. Lithuania's oil group Mazeikiu Nafta remains the largest company in the Baltics

If we compare the figures of 1998 - the year of the Russian recession - with those of 2000, it seems obvious that everything has changed, but this may not always be for the best. Some enterprises have fallen out of the boat; others have not only found themselves among the elite, but have managed to squeeze out previous leaders. Lithuania's Achema appeared on the stage of the least represented industry - the chemical industry - and immediately took first place. A newcomer on the list for food-processing, Kraft Food Lietuva has taken second place in the sector.

Preference is still given to companies dealing in trade. It appears that the most "trading" country is Estonia: 10 out of 21 companies in our list of the biggest are from Estonia. Fifteen companies share our second list with companies in the oil industry, while 15 also represent the transport branch. Comparing this year's top with the BC review in 1998, another newcomer for sectors is the medicaments and health service list.

As Lithuania and Estonia do not provide such information, there are no financial establishments mentioned in our lists, nevertheless, the Latvian top 300 does include three commercial banks and the Bank of Latvia with a turnover of over 30 million US dollars each.

The following tables include companies with net turnover in excess of 30 million US dollars, using average exchange rates for the national currencies as follows: USD 1 = LVL 0.61, USD 1 = LTL 4.00, USD 1 = EEK 16.80.

Energy, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Lietuvos Energija

Electricity

359.25

451.7

Latvenergo

Electricity

270.94

292.5

Eesti Energija

Electricity

260.16

235.0

Lietuvos Dujos

Gas trade

162.5

147.3

Latvijas Gaze

Gas trade

142.54

146.7

Ignalinas Atomine Elektrine

Electricity

127.42

183.4

Rigas Siltums

Heat supply

89.26

111.6

Vilniaus Silumos Tinklai

Heat supply

77.55

-

Eesti Gaas

Gas trade

56.38

46.0

Kauno Energija

Electricity, heat supply

44.65

-

Tallinna Soojus

Heat supply

41.18

55.0

Although in comparison to 1998, the turnover of Lietuvos Energija has considerably decreased - almost by 100 million US dollars, it still is the leader of the energy branch. While the Ignalina nuclear reactors (Ignalinos atomine elektrine) keep running, the Lietuvos Energija management can feel safe. Only time will tell what happens in several years' time - Lithuania has agreed to stop operations of the first nuclear reactor at Ignalina by 2005. The future of the second reactor was expected to be decided upon in 2004, but the EU insists that Lithuania make a decision this year on closing the entire plant by 2009. For now, the Ignalina nuke ranks among others in the list, where no power generating companies from either Latvia or Estonia are represented. Lietuvos Dujos is the leader in the gas sector, and it seems likely that it will leave its rivals far behind in future. If Russia's gas giant Gazprom decides to build a gas pipeline to Kaliningrad through Lithuania by the end of the year, the volume of gas transported through the new pipeline would amount to 25 billion cubic meters annually, which should bring about 160 million litas to the Lithuanian budget each year.

Chemicals, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Achema

Chemical industry

116.41

-

Lifosa

Chemical industry

107.33

100.0

Viru Keemia Grupp

Chemical industry

44.94

-

In comparison, the modest number of companies in the chemical industry list has halved since our last review. Top positions in the branch are still split between Estonia and Lithuania; Latvia, as before, falls behind in this sector.

Oil refinery, trade of crude oil and oil products

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Mazeikiu Nafta

Refining, transport, trade

1053.96

704.2

Kurzemes Degviela

Trade

187.92

84.9

Mikro Liks

Wholesale trade

99.10

-

Latvija Statoil

Trade

88.87

69.9

Lietuva Statoil

Trade

87.92

55.3

Lukoil Baltija

Trade

76.80

92.8

Dinaz Nafta

Wholesale trade

69.36

52.8

Neste Eesti

Wholesale trade

60.15

78.9

Saurix Petroleum

Trade

54.94

-

Lukoil Baltija R

Wholesale trade

45.74

41.6

Neste Latvija

Wholesale trade

42.28

-

Lietuvos Kuras

Trade

34.66

-

Viada

Trade

34.46

-

Minijos Nafta

Oil drilling

33.22

-

Tarkoil

Trade

32.20

-

This time the oil industry is represented not only by oil trade and transport companies, but, pleasantly, also by an oil drilling company - Lithuania's Minijos Nafta, which did not appear, for example, in the list of 1998. The only oil refining company, and the constant leader for all lists, Lithuania's Mazeikiu Nafta with a turnover of 1.05 billion US dollars in 2000, exceeds the results of all 14 other companies in the branch put together. It is also true that the losses of Mazeikiu Nafta constituted to 179.1 million litas (44.77 million US dollars) in 2000. Moreover, according to initial estimates and generally accepted US accounting principles, the Lithuanian oil group also suffered losses of 277.2 million litas (69.3 million US dollars) for 2001, which is an increase of 55 percent. Nevertheless, Latvia still succeeds with the number of trading companies, moreover, local companies seem to be competing fairly successfully with Neste and Statoil.

Forestry and timber industry, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Latvijas Finieris

Timber processing

94.01

84.2

Sylvester

Timber processing and trade

78.84

38.4

Nelss

Timber processing and trade

52.13

42.9

RMK

Timber processing

47.04

-

Stora Enso Mezs

Forestry

45.28

-

Stora Enso Mets

Forestry

45.09

-

Lindeks

Trade

37.21

43.6

Weeluk

Exports

36.16

-

atvia and Estonia equally divided this niche between themselves. It must be pointed out that two years ago, Latvian companies were predominant in this branch. Lithuania, as before, is not represented in the list of woodworking industry; they are still standing guard over their green resources.

Food industry, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Rokiskio Suris

Dairy products

77.18

51.2

Kraft Food Lietuva

Confectionery

58.67

-

Pieno Zvaigzdes

Dairy products

52.7

45.9

Saku Olletehase

Beer

43.37

30.2

Rakvere Lihakombinat

Meat products

41.84

67.2

Latvijas Balzams

Alcoholic beverages

41.56

34.7

Zemaitijos Pienas

Dairy products

38.93

53.4

The number of food industry representatives has decreased to seven in comparison with the 16 in 1998. Latvia is represented by only one company, but it is the largest producer of alcoholic beverages in the Baltic states: Latvijas Balzams has overcome its neighbors - Estonia's Liviko and Lithuania's Kalnapilis, which are not among the top one hundred Baltic companies. According to the ranking, it seems Lithuanians prefer milk: all three dairies are Lithuanian, while Estonians, evidently, like their beer.

Transport and transit, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Latvijas Dzelzcels

Railway

159.15

189.3

Lietuvos Gelezinkeliai

Railway

149.24

148.6

Ventspils Ekspedicija

Transit services

126.47

-

Hansatee Grupp

Navigation

109.42

93.4

Ventspils Nafta

Transit services

78.18

87.3

Pakterminal

Stevedoring services

68.15

54.0

Eesti Marelaevandus

Navigation

67.67

88.0

Ventbunkers

Transit services

62.93

37.8

Intopex

Forwarding services

59.51

-

ONAKO Eesti

Transport of oil products

57.39

-

Lietuvos Juru Laivininkyste

Sea transport

57.04

-

Lietuvos Avialinijos

Air transport

54.50

-

Eesti Raudtee

Railway

52.39

75.0

E.S.S.

Transit services

51.14

-

Tallinna Sadam

Port

50.58

56.8

The turnover of many transport companies in this list of 15 has fallen since last, evident of a situation not too favorable for transit. Ventspils Nafta oil terminal is among the five largest companies of the transport branch. Of the three Baltic shipping companies, the Latvian Shipping Company, with its turnover of only 12.75 million US dollars in 2000 was lagging far behind others.

Light industry, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Ee Kreenholmi Kudumise

Textiles

73.75

36.6

Alytaus Tekstile

Textiles

42.03

-

Ogre

Knitwear

34.40

-

Utenos Trikotazas

Knitwear

30.61

-

Communications, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Lietuvos Telekomas

Telecommunications

259.64

225.8

Lattelekom

Telecommunications

222.41

193.3

Eesti Telefon

Telecommunications

148.97

87.1

LMT

Mobile telecommunications

140.57

75.9

EMT

Mobile telecommunications

96.32

62.9

Omnitel

Mobile telecommunications

85.00

-

TELE 2

Mobile telecommunications

36.34

-

ithuania's Omnitel and Latvia's TELE 2 (still named Baltcom GSM when these figures were calculated) have joined the list of companies providing communications. It is obvious that mobile communications in the Baltic States are becoming more and more popular, with mobile telephone clients just about to surpass the number of fixed line phone subscriptions.

Trade, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Vilniaus Priekyba

Wholesale and retail

425.00

188.0

Sanitex

Wholesale

200.00

131.8

Senuku Priekybos Centras

Wholesale of construction materials

74.57

76.4

Tallinna Kaubamaja

Shopping center

70.73

39.7

Alianse - 2

Food wholesale

59.88

56.3

Stockmann

Shopping center

54.27

51.5

Kaupmes & Ko

Wholesale

47.37

38.7

Nemuno Banga

Wholesale

46.19

-

Rimi Baltija

Food

41.72

29.0

Bankend Eesti

Tobacco

40.26

37.0

ETK Hulgi

Wholesale

39.41

55.1

Kesko Eesti

Wholesale

36.86

-

Fanaal

Construction materials

36.45

-

ELKO Grupa

IT equipment

36.29

-

Greiss

Tobacco

35.20

30.4

GNT Lietuva

IT equipment

34.5

-

LEX - U

Food wholesale

33.34

-

Polimer R

Alcohol wholesale

31.85

-

RIMI Latvija

Trade (?retail?)

31.50

-

Trojina

Wholesale trade

31.38

-

Procter & Gamble Latvija

Trade

30.19

102.7

The leader far in front of its rivals, Vilniaus Priekyba, has increased its turnover more than twice in three years, also having launched operations outside Lithuania. Nevertheless, looking at the number of trading companies, Estonians are still in front.

Construction, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Merko Ehitus

Construction

84.45

37.6

EE Grupp

Construction

48.81

-

FKSM

Construction

43.18

-

Venceb

Construction

42.28

29.4

Skanska EMV

Construction

41.67

38.3

Algos Grupe

Construction

30.11

-

Constructors, especially Estonian companies, represented with an overwhelming majority on this list, are also strengthening their positions. Among the rookies is Lithuania's Algos Grupe.

Engineering, electrical appliances, metalurgy, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Ekranas

TV screens

109.25

72.1

Liepajas Metalurgs

Metalurgy

107.55

99.7

Baltijos automobiliu Technika

Electrical engineering

64.05

-

Eesti Metallieksport

Trade in metals

42.40

29.9

Krasainie Lejumi

Metalurgy and exports

38.66

-

Norma

Motor vehicle equipment

37.61

40.0

Severstallat

Trade in steel

35.13

-

Elcoteq Tallinn

Mobile telephones

35.00

-

Snaige

Refrigerators

34.17

43.5

Rigas Kugu Buvetava

Shipyard

33.01

-

Vilniaus Vingis

Electrical engineering

30.09

-

Pharmaceuticals, health services, mln USD

Company

Industry

2000

1998

Limedika

Trade in pharmaceuticals

166.31

-

Tamro Lietuva

Trade in pharmaceuticals

117.57

-

Armila

Trade in pharmaceuticals

97.79

-

Tamro Latvija

Trade in pharmaceuticals

39.21

-

Tamro Eesti

Trade in pharmaceuticals

31.48

-

No company dealing with health services is among the largest Baltic enterprises. Only the Riga Stradina Kliniska Universitates Slimnica hospital may have entered the list, but its turnover of 23.5 million US dollars is not enough for our criteria; obviously, health services will be growing more expensive in the future, and we may expect some such companies on this list.


PRIVATIZATION
RATING
HISTORY
Go to Top of page